Christian Couple Lose Battle to be Foster Parents

Owen and Eunice Johns
Owen and Eunice Johns

A report in The Independent will be of interest to Christian people who hold to mainstream Christian views on sexual ethics. The paper has reported on how a Christian couple who are morally opposed to homosexuality because of their faith lost a High Court battle over the right to become foster carers.

Northern Ireland Foster Care reports that there are around 2,500 children and young people in care in Northern Ireland. Currently 1,700 of these children and young people being looked after by HSC Trusts are living with foster carers. There is an urgent need for more foster carers in Northern Ireland.

The question is: Can Christian couples who hold orthodox views on sexual morality apply to be foster carers? Or will they be excluded on the basis of their moral beliefs? Here’s the report from The Independent:

Eunice and Owen Johns, aged 62 and 65, from Oakwood, Derby, went to court after a social worker expressed concerns when they said they could not tell a child a “homosexual lifestyle” was acceptable.

The Pentecostal Christian couple had applied to Derby City Council to be respite carers but withdrew their application, believing it “doomed to failure” because of the social worker’s attitude to their religious beliefs.

Today they asked judges to rule that their faith should not be a bar to them becoming carers, and the law should protect their Christian values.

But Lord Justice Munby and Mr Justice Beatson ruled that laws protecting people from discrimination because of their sexual orientation “should take precedence” over the right not to be discriminated against on religious grounds.

The Johns are considering an appeal.

Outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London, where the decision was given, Mrs Johns stood alongside her husband as she said: “We are extremely distressed at what the judges have ruled today.

“All we wanted was to offer a loving home to a child in need. We have a good track record as foster parents.

“But because we are Christians, with mainstream Christian views on sexual ethics, we are apparently unsuitable as foster parents.

“We are unsure how we can continue the application process following the court’s ruling today.

“We have been excluded because we have moral opinions based on our faith and we feel sidelined because we are Christians with normal, mainstream, Christian views on sexual ethics.

“The judges have suggested that our views might harm children.

“We have been told by the Equality and Human Rights Commission that our moral views may ‘infect’ a child.

“We do not believe that this is so. We are prepared to love and accept any child. All we were not willing to do was to tell a small child that the practice of homosexuality was a good thing.

“Worst of all, a vulnerable child has now likely missed the chance of finding a safe and caring home at a time when there are so few people willing to foster or adopt.

“We feel excluded and that there is no place for us in society.

“We have not received justice. We believe that an independent inquiry is needed to look into this.”

Ben Summerskill, chief executive of Stonewall, the lesbian, gay and bisexual charity, said: ‘We’re delighted that the High Court’s landmark decision has favoured 21st-century decency above 19th-century prejudice.

“In any fostering case the interests of the 60,000 children in care should override the bias of any prospective parent.”

“Thankfully, Mr and Mrs Johns’s out-dated views aren’t just out of step with the majority of people in modern Britain, but those of many Christians too. If you wish to be involved in the delivery of a public service, you should be prepared to provide it fairly to anyone.”

The Christian Legal Centre reacted to today’s ruling with dismay and warned “fostering by Christians is now in doubt”.

The organisation said the judges had effectively ruled “homosexual ‘rights’ trump freedom of conscience in the UK”.

The judges had stated that “biblical Christian beliefs may be ‘inimical’ to children, and implicitly upheld an Equalities and Human Rights Commission (ECHC) submission that children risk being ‘infected’ by Christian moral beliefs”.

The CLC said the judgment summary “sends out the clear message that orthodox Christian ethical beliefs are potentially harmful to children and that Christian parents with mainstream Christian views are not suitable to be considered as potential foster parents”.

Andrea Minichiello Williams, chief executive of Christian Concern and the CLC, said: “The judges have claimed that there was no discrimination against the Johns as Christians because they were being excluded from fostering due to their sexual ethics and not their Christian beliefs.

“This claim that their moral beliefs on sex have nothing to do with their Christian faith is a clear falsehood made in order to justify their ruling.

“How can judges get away with this?

“What has happened to the Johns is part of a wider trend seen in recent years.

“The law has been increasingly interpreted by judges in a way which favours homosexual rights over freedom of conscience.

“Britain is now leading Europe in intolerance to religious belief.”

The case, thought to be the first of its kind, has been described by Christian lawyers as vital for religious freedoms and values.

An open letter signed by senior clerics, including former archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey, has already warned that gay rights laws put homosexual rights over those of others.

Roman Catholic adoption agencies have closed because they cannot reconcile the requirements under the new equality laws with their belief that children should not be placed with gay couples.

At last year’s hearing of the Johns’ case at Nottingham Crown Court, Paul Diamond, representing the Johns, argued that the courts should protect Christian values as they were recognised as “giving a moral framework to values in our country”.

6 Replies to “Christian Couple Lose Battle to be Foster Parents”

  1. was at an initial foster caring meeting last night and to be honest I was afraid to even raise the issue after seeing the article on the internet yesterday. You certainly need to be very careful in the way you express your opinion on the issue if you are a Christian.

  2. Taking the link attached by Andrew as read, i have been increasingly concerned about the hype and misrepresentation by some “Christian” organisations particularly in an attempt to whip up believer fury!

    Christians are truly persecuted in parts of the world for instance in China, but for the majority of the time we in the UK and ireland are not, but we have allowed ourselves to be marginalised and have created for ourselves a victimhood culture unworthy of the gospel we preach.

    On too many occasions the church’s involvement in political life has been focused on matters of other people’s sex and sexuality not on the issues most spoken about inthe scriptures, issues such as poverty, the homeless, the widow etc.

    There are plenty of examples of Governments, including our own, treating the vulnerable and trhe disposessed badly but the church never speaks out and our hypocrisy is simply rife.

  3. Although I hold to an orthodox Biblical position on sexuality, I think there is some truth in what Eglise observes – both in terms of alarmist Christians and their silence on other issues. I don’t know enough about the couple in question however to comment on that specific case.

  4. I think the issue is about Liberty and Freedom, Not really about Christian percecution or even about the issues surrounding Homosexuality. What the Case highlights is that we are no longer able to beleive what we want and play our part in society at large. the Courts have now dictated to us exactly what we are, and are not to believe concerning the issue of Human sexuality.

    As a Citizen of this Country that is very worrying! what right have the judges in the high court or the government to dictate to us what we are to believe? in a free society they have no right we should be able to freely believe what we want. so we are witnessing the erosion of our freedoms which affect not just christians but everyone in our society.

    once the government or those judges start dictating what people are to believe we are in danger of giving up our freedoms. Those freedoms happen to come from years of understanding built up around the ideas of church and state and specifically the Protestant Religion. once these are removed what replaces them?

    Can secular values provide the moral frame work for our society? or for that matter any society? we just need to look at the histroy of the 20th Century to answer that and take a long hard look at Stalins Russia to see what actually is at stake here.

    Do we really want to live in a society were the government and courts can tells us what to believe? i certainty don’t! i suspect the people above would not either. a draw your attention to an article by Melaine Phillips which gets it spot on:

  5. I’m glad that I read the link referred to above. In this case it is not the Church who were focused on a matter of sexuality but the Council. To quote from the link. “after social workers asked questions about how their Christian views would affect their response to a child who said they were gay; the couple and the council decided to make a joint application to the High Court for guidance.”

    Those questions provoked a response that may in turn have been manipulated by others. However, those questions are the key to this matter. What exactly were those questions and why do they form part of the selection process for fostering? Are those questions asked when the children to be fostered are of Primary School age?

Comments are closed.